Petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the writ petition with permission to file an appropriate petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Liberty to withdraw and file an appropriate petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~117
VICKY CHAUHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. B.P. Sharma, Mr. Ashish Gill, Ms. Shivani Kathpalia, Ms. Harshita Tripathi & Mr. Samsun, Advocates.
versus
| STATE GOVT OF NCT OF | DELHI | |
|---|---|---|
| AND ORS | .....Respondents | |
| Through: | Mr. Sa |
njeev Bhandari, |
| ASC-CR | L for the State | |
| alongwit | h Ms. Charu |
|
| Sharma, | Mr. Arjit Sharma | |
| & Mr. Advocat |
Nikunj Bindal, es. |
|
| SI H.R. | Choudhary (P.S. | |
| Gandhi | Nagar). |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 06.12.2024
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
DECEMBER 6, 2024
‘Aman’
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/12/2024 at 13:04:35
Vicky Chauhan
State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
