Petition to quash FIR 308/2019 under Sections 498-A/406/354/34 IPC after parties executed a settlement memorandum; final payment made in Court. Court quashed the FIR and consequential proceedings on grounds that continuing prosecution served no fruitful purpose and would secure ends of justice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
versus
STATE OF NCT THROUGH SHO & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC (Crl) with Ms. Neelu, Mr. Ashish and Mr. Ruhil, Advs. SI Sheetal, PS Hauz Khas. Mr.Vijay Chawla, Mr.Arun Mahajan, Mr.Vaibhav Chawla and Mr.Vipul Saini, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 through V.C.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R D E R
%
05.12.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:34:29
claims.
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:34:29
therefrom, if any, are hereby quashed.
JASMEET SINGH, J
DECEMBER 5, 2024/ akc
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:34:29
1 issue framed by the court
Should FIR No. 308/2019 under Sections 498-A/406/354/34 IPC be quashed given the parties' settlement?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Virender Sharma & Ors.
State of NCT through SHO
Respondent No. 2 (wife)
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
