Amar v. NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought quashing of an FIR. Court noted pending closure and protest petition. Disposed of the writ petition and the related application, leaving petitioner to seek alternative remedy if aggrieved.
What did the court decide?
Petition and pending application disposed; liberty to seek remedy if aggrieved.
What the court decided
$~48
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 1971/2023 and CRL.M.A. 18234/2023 AMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr.Madan Mohan Kashyap, Advocate versus
NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr.Rahul Tyagi, ASC for State with Ms.Priya Rai, Mr.Sangeet, Mr.Mathew, Mr.Anikate, Advocate with SI Vijay
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R
- % 05.12.2024
- By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.539/2014 registered under Sections 419/468/471 IPC at P.S. Sarai Rohilla, Delhi.
- Learned ASC for the State submits that a closure and a protest petition by the complainant have been filed, which are pending consideration before the concerned court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Amar
- respondent
NCT of Delhi
Coram
Manoj Kumar Ohri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court