This order dismisses a petition seeking parole. The Court held that the petitioner is not entitled to release as he previously jumped parole and overstayed by nearly four years constituting a serious violation of conditions.
Petition for parole dismissed; petitioner not entitled to release on parole.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
DEVENDER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ishaan Phukan, Ms. A. Sahitya Veena & Mr. Faraz Maqbool, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT) OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC-CRL for the State alongwith Mr Alok Sharma, Mr. Vasu Agarwal & Ms. Pragya Sharma, Advocates. SI Anil (P.S. Seemapuri).
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 09.12.2024
W.P.(CRL) 1985/2024
Page 1 of 3
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2024 at 12:01:30
act as a motivation for them to maintain good conduct while in prison. The Hon’ble Apex Court in Asfaq v. State of Rajasthan and Others : (2017) 15 SCC 55 while summarising the difference between parole and furlough, and the grounds to grant the same observed as under:
“11. There is a subtle distinction between parole and furlough. A parole can be defined as conditional release of prisoners i.e. an early release of a prisoner, conditional on good behaviour and regular reporting to the authorities for a set period of time. It can also be defined as a form of conditional pardon by which the convict is released before the expiration of his term. Thus, the parole is granted for good behaviour on the condition that parolee regularly reports to a supervising officer for a specified period. Such a release of the prisoner on parole can also be temporarily on some basic grounds. In that eventuality, it is to be treated as mere suspension of the sentence for time being, keeping the quantum of sentence intact. Release on parole is designed to afford some relief to the prisoners in certain specified exigencies. Such paroles are normally granted in certain situations some of which may be as follows:
(i) a member of the prisoner's family has died or is seriously ill or the prisoner himself is seriously ill; or
(ii) the marriage of the prisoner himself, his son, daughter, grandson, granddaughter, brother, sister, sister's son or daughter is to be celebrated; or
(iii) the temporary release of the prisoner is necessary for ploughing, sowing or harvesting or carrying on any other agricultural operation of his land or his father's undivided land actually in possession of the prisoner; or
(iv) it is desirable to do so for any other sufficient cause;
(v) parole can be granted only after a portion of sentence is already served;
(vi) if conditions of parole are not abided by the parolee he may be returned to serve his sentence in prison, such conditions may be such as those of committing a new offence; and
(vii) parole may also be granted on the basis of aspects related to health of convict himself.
xxx xxx xxx 14. Furlough, on the other hand, is a brief release from the prison. It is conditional and is given in case of long-term imprisonment. The period of sentence spent on furlough by the prisoners need not be undergone by him as is done in the case of parole. Furlough is granted as a good conduct remission.
15. A convict, literally speaking, must remain in jail for the period of sentence or for rest of his life in case he is a life convict. It is in this context that his release from jail for a
Page 2 of 3
W.P.(CRL) 1985/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2024 at 12:01:30
short period has to be considered as an opportunity afforded to him not only to solve his personal and family problems but also to maintain his links with society. Convicts too must breathe fresh air for at least some time provided they maintain good conduct consistently during incarceration and show a tendency to reform themselves and become good citizens. Thus, redemption and rehabilitation of such prisoners for good of societies must receive due weightage while they are undergoing sentence of imprisonment.”
(emphasis supplied)
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
DECEMBER 9, 2024/ ‘Aman’
Page 3 of 3
W.P.(CRL) 1985/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2024 at 12:01:30
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a petitioner is entitled to release on parole after previously jumping parole.
Whether a prior violation of parole conditions bars further consideration of parole applications.
Whether parole grants are indefeasible rights or conditional privileges subject to good behavior.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Punjab v. AsfaqReferred¶13
Asfaq v. State of Rajasthan and Others : (2017) 15 SCC 55 · Who else cites this
Devender Singh
The State
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
