Allowed

Toufeeq Khan v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

Delhi HC9 Dec 2024W.P.(CRL)/1602/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No.404/2022 regarding a traffic accident on the ground of an amicable settlement between the petitioner and the victim. The court ordered release of the deposited settlement amount and payment of costs to the Avlamban Fund Scheme.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.404/2022 and consequent proceedings are quashed subject to release of the settled amount to the respondent and payment of Rs.10,000 cost to the Avlamban Fund Scheme within four weeks.

Toufeeq Khan Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~41

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 1602/2023

¶4

TOUFEEQ KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Harvir Singh, Advocate with petitioner in person

¶5

versus

¶6

THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR.

¶7

.....Respondents

¶8

Through: Mr.Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for State with Mr.Alok, Mr.Vasu and Ms.Pragya, Advocates with SI Virender Respondent No.2 in person

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R

¶11

% 09.12.2024

¶12

The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No.404/2022 registered under Sections 279/338 IPC and Sections 146/196 MV Act at P.S. Kamla Market, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

¶13

As per the allegations levelled in the FIR, respondent No.2 met with an accident from the vehicle of the petitioner.

¶14

Learned APP for the State submits that in the present case, the petitioner is the only accused and respondent No.2 is the complainant/victim. He further submits that considering the serious nature of averments/allegations and that the incident has taken place at a public place and since the State machinery has been put in use, the petitioner be saddled with some costs.

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:48:07

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have entered into a settlement vide Settlement Award dated 31.01.2023 before Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi passed in MACT No. 972/2020 and further submits that in the MACT proceedings, the petitioner has already deposited a sum of Rs.1,02,000/- out of which Rs.22,000/- has already been released to the injured/respondent No.2 it was stated that Rs.80,000/- would be paid to injured/respondent No.2 at the time of quashing of the FIR. Learned counsel undertakes that the necessary steps for release of the remaining amount in favour of the injured/respondent No.2 would be taken at the earliest and the petitioner would cooperate in the same and in terms of the settlement, respondent No.2 is now left with no claim or grievance whatsoever against the petitioner.

¶18

The petitioner, who is present in the Court, has been identified by his counsel as well as by the concerned Investigating Officer. Respondent No.2, who is present in the Court, has also been identified by the concerned Investigating Officer.

¶19

The petitioner has shown remorse for his conduct, and he undertakes not to repeat the same in future. Respondent No.2 states that she has entered into the aforesaid Settlement Award out of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She further states that she has no objection if the present FIR and consequent proceedings are quashed subject to release of the aforesaid amount.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

¶21

The parties shall remain bound by the statements and undertaking made in Court today.

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:48:07

¶24

In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed subject to release of the aforesaid amount in favour of the injured/respondent No.2 and subject to payment of cost of Rs.10,000/- by the petitioner to be deposited with 'Avlamban Fund Scheme 2024' (State Bank of India, Tis Hazari Branch, Delhi, Account No. 43599660056; IFSC SBIN0000726 & MICR Code 110002126) within a period of four weeks from today.

¶25

Proof evidencing receipt of deposit shall be filed with the I.O. In case the receipt of payment of cost is not filed within the stipulated time, the I.O. shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application.

¶26

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of.

¶27

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

¶28

DECEMBER 9, 2024 na

¶29

This is a digitally signed order.

¶30

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:48:07

Toufeeq Khan v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Toufeeq Khan v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikas Sidhu Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Annas Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Ajay Kumar and Others Vs the State Govt.of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Bertram Devadas & Ors. Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Saikat Mukhopadhyay & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Rajesh Kumar Burman Vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Vikas Chaudhary Vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Ms N Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Akil Ahmad Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Vikas Sidhu Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Vinay Kumar & Ors. Vs State Ofnct of Delhi & Anr.

Govind Ram Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Satish Chauhan Vs State of NCT Delhi & Ors.