Disposed

Annas v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Delhi HC6 Dec 2024W.P.(CRL)/3751/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A convict petitioner sought extension of parole under Section 528 BNSS to care for his minor son requiring heart-related surgery. Relying on a hospital certificate indicating eight weeks of treatment and post-surgery care, the Court extended parole by eight weeks on existing terms, refused further extension, and directed compliance via the Jail Superintendent.

What did the court decide?

Parole extended by eight weeks w.e.f. 02.02.2025 on same terms as order dated 06.12.2024; no further extension.

Annas Vs State (Nct of Delhi) — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~53

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 3751/2024

¶4

ANNAS .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocate

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) GNCTD for Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC (Crl.) GNCTD, Mr. Mathew M. Philip, Mr. Sangeet Sibou andMr. Aniket Kumar Singh, Advocate SI Deepak, PS: Timarpur

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 31.01.2025

¶12

CRL.M.A. 2605/2025 (for exemption)

¶13

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶14

Accordingly, this application stands disposed of.

¶15

CRL.M.A. 2604/2025 (Application under Section 528 of BNSS for extension of parole for a period of 90 days)

¶16

The present application has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNSS’) seeking extension of parole for a period of ninety (90) days granted to the Petitioner by this Court vide order date 06.12.2024 and extended vide order dated 03.01.2025.

¶17

It is stated that the minor son of the Petitioner aged about 13 years is seriously ill as he is suffering from an ailment since birth i.e., cyanotic heart

¶18

W.P.(CRL) 3751/2024

¶19

Page 1 of 3

¶20

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:35:19

¶21

disease and has undergone three (3) surgeries. It is stated that the said minor son may have to undergo the 4^th surgery in near future and for the said reason the Petitioner is seeking extension of parole to make requisite arrangements.

¶22

Learned ASC has filed Status Report dated 30.01.2025 and has enclosed a certificate issued by the Director, Medanta dated 30.01.2025.

¶23

This Court has perused the record and the status report.

¶24

The certificate dated 30.01.2025 states that the patient is undergoing dressing every five (5) days in OPD and explains the condition of the patient/minor child. The relevant portion of the certificate reads as under:

¶25

“Currently patient is undergoing NPWT (VAC) dressing every 5 days so patient needs follow up every fifth day in OPD until wound optimizes. Wound closure (Local flap cover) is planned after wound optimization (Tentatively after 2 weeks). Complete healing is expected to be 2-3 weeks after flap cover is done and patient will be fit to do his routine activities after 2-3 weeks post-surgery. (Flap cover)”

¶26

7.1 A perusal of the said certificate shows that the patient/minor child would require eight (8) weeks for the treatment and post-surgery care. The Petitioner in this application has sought extension of parole for 90 days, however, keeping in view the certificate issued by the Director, Medanta dated 30.01.2025, the parole is extended by a period of eight (8) weeks w.e.f. 02.02.2025 on the same terms and conditions as set out in the order dated 06.12.2024.

¶27

With the aforesaid directions, the application stands disposed of.

¶28

It is made clear that no further extension will be granted and the Petitioner must make alternate arrangements in these eight (8) weeks, for the medical care and upkeep of his minor son.

W.P.(CRL) 3751/2024

Page 2 of 3

A copy of this order be sent to the Jail Superintendent for information and necessary compliance.

¶33

The digitally signed copy of this order, duly uploaded on the official website of the Delhi High Court, www.delhihighcourt.nic.in, shall be treated as a certified copy of the order for the purpose of ensuring compliance. No physical copy of order shall be insisted by any authority/entity or litigant.

¶34

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J

¶35

JANUARY 31, 2025/ msh/sk

¶36

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶37

W.P.(CRL) 3751/2024

¶38

Page 3 of 3

¶39

Annas v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Annas v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tushar Aneja and Anr. Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Amar Vs NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Virender Sharma & Ors. Vs State of NCT through SHO & Anr.

Sahil & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Toufeeq Khan Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

Satish Chauhan Vs State of NCT Delhi & Ors.

Xxxxx Vs the State of NCT Delhi and Ors.

Devender Singh Vs the State (Govt of Nct) of Delhi

Jitender Kumar Nishad @ Jitu Vs the State and Others

Tushar Aneja and Anr. Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Dr. Priyanka Kureel and Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Kunal Bajaj Vs State of NCT of Delhi through SHO & Anr.

Pooja Vs State (Nct of Delhi)