A married couple settled their disputes via a memorandum of understanding after an FIR alleging kidnapping and sexual offences; respondent no. 2 consented to quashing, so the High Court quashed the FIR.
FIR No. 400/2023 PS Budh Vihar under Sections 363/366/376 IPC and Section 4 POCSO, and all consequential proceedings, quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~46
ALAMGIR SK .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Jai Subhash Thakur, Adovcate with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel, Crl. with Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Advocate for State. Respondent No. 2 in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 21.08.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/08/2024 at 11:52:49
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/08/2024 at 11:52:49
some issues with the petitioner due to which, she under the misguidance of the people gave a complaint against the petitioner in the Police Station on the basis of which, the present FIR got registered.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/08/2024 at 11:52:49
363/366/376 of IPC, 1860 and Section 4 of POCSO Act and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
AUGUST 21, 2024 S.Sharma
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/08/2024 at 11:52:49
1 issue framed by the court
Should FIR No. 400/2023 under Sections 363/366/376 IPC and Section 4 POCSO be quashed given the parties' amicable settlement?
6 provisions across 6 enactments
Alamgir Sk
The State NCT of Delhi
Respondent No. 2
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
