The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner after permission was sought, noting that the medical examination had already been conducted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
MS B THROUGH HER MOTHER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.D.Windlesh, Advocate.
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC for state with Mr. Amit Peswani, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 21.08.2024
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
AUGUST 21, 2024 rk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/08/2024 at 11:52:36
MS B THROUGH HER MOTHER
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
