Writ petition seeking quashing of FIR under Sections 419/420/468/471 IPC; after arguments counsel sought permission to withdraw and the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without deciding any issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~50
versus STATE AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC, Crl., Mr. Amit Peshwani & Mr. Ankur Raghav, Advocates for State. s. Sakshi Kumar, Mr. Raja Singh, Mr. Gaurav Garg & Ms. Preety Pandey, Advocates for R-2 with R-2 in person. S.I./I.O. Rakesh Kumar, Cyber, PS Outer District, Delhi.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R
% 20.08.2024
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
AUGUST 20, 2024 S.Sharma
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/08/2024 at 11:21:28
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Balram Kumar Jha and Ors
State
Anr
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
