Petitioner sought setting aside a transit remand order. Court held matter infructuous and disposed of the petition.
Petition disposed of as being infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~51& 52
GAURAV SHARMA (IN JC), (THROUGH PEROKAR SHRI
PRAFULA PANDIT) .....Petitioner
Through: Ms Divya Rastogi (Adv) for Mr Priyadarshi Manish (Adv) versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, with Mr. Tarun Singh and Mr. Abhay, Advocates. Mr. Farman Ali, SPC and Ms. Usha Jamnal, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 20.08.2024
ANISH DAYAL, J
AUGUST 20, 2024/RK
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/08/2024 at 12:36:20
Gaurav Sharma
Union of India
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
