Dismissed

Nikita Kharel v. Union of India

Delhi HC20 Aug 2024W.P.(CRL)/1143/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court disposed of Cr.M.A. filed for recall of an order recalling a Writ Petition regarding a withdrawn LOC from FRRO. Court held that the LOC was confirmed withdrawn via email and no ground for recall survived, thus the application was barred as the matter had effectively been taken care of.

What did the court decide?

The Application was accordingly disposed of; no ground for recall of the Order dated 20.08.2024 found.

Nikita Kharel Vs Union of India — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~68

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 1143/2023

¶4

NIKITA KHAREL .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Vijay Dalmia and mr. Rajat jain, Advocates

¶6

versus

¶7

UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Beriwal and Ms. Ojasvi, Advocates

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

¶9

O R D E R % 28.08.2024

¶10

Crl.M.A.25553/2024(for restoration)

¶11

The present Application has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for recall of the Order dated 20.08.2024.

¶12

It is submitted in the Application that the Writ Petition was listed for final disposal on 02.04.2024 when the counsel for the respondent informed the petitioner that the FRRO has already withdrawn the subject LOC issued against the Petitioner. However, due to paucity of time, the matter could not be heard.

¶13

The matter was again listed on 30.05.2024 but again could not be taken up. Now on the next date of hearing i.e.20.08.2024, the matter was listed but due to the heavy board it could not reach.

¶14

Around 4:00pm, the counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that the counsel for the respondent has withdrawn the LOC. The matter was

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2024 at 11:59:10

¶16

lingering for the last five months and can be disposed of on the statement of the respondent. However, due to some miscommunication, the matter was disposed of.

¶17

On the next date i.e.21.08.2024, the counsel for the petitioner mentioned the aforesaid fact but the Court was not willing to interfere with the Order already made on the previous date. The present Application has been thus filed and a request is made to the counsel for the respondent to give the Statement for withdrawal of the LOC after recalling the Order dated 20.08.2024.

¶18

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the averments made in the petition are absolutely incorrect and amounts to overreaching. However, it is confirmed via e-mail dated 01.04.2024 as received from Bureau of Immigration, the LOC of the petitioner has been withdrawn.

¶19

The copy of the e-mail is placed and taken on record.

¶20

Nothing survives as there is no ground for recall of the Order.

¶21

Application accordingly disposed of.

¶22

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J

¶23

AUGUST 28, 2024/PT

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2024 at 11:59:10

Nikita Kharel v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nikita Kharel v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit & Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Utpal Tripathi Vs State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Anr.

Nikita Awasthi Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Saniya and Anr. Vs State and Ors.

Ranjan Sardana Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Uma Shankar Mehta Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Ashok Kumar Jain Vs State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Alamgir Sk Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Sultan Ansari Vs Directorate of Revenue Intelligence & Anr.

Darshan Dabas Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Nikita Awasthi Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Balram Kumar Jha and Ors. Vs State and Anr.

Shashi Jindal Vs Bank of Baroda & Ors.

Anil Kumar Garg Vs the State of N C T of Delhi & Ors.