The High Court of Delhi dismissed a criminal warrant petition as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to raise contentions before the Trial Court. No substantive legal principles were enunciated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
ASHOK KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Raj Kumar Chandiwal, Advocate (through VC).
versus
THE STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel with Mr. Priyam Agarwal, Mr. Abhinav Kumar and Mr. C. Kaushik, Advocates and with SI Jagmal Singh, P.S. Rajouri Garden. Ms. Tara Narula and Mr. Harshvardhan Jain, Advocates for R- 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R
% 18.01.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/05/2024 at 12:15:16
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
JANUARY 18, 2024/zp
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/05/2024 at 12:15:16
Ashok Kumar
The State
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
