Writ petition seeking action on the petitioner's complaint; the Investigating Officer informed the court that appropriate action would be taken, and the petition was accordingly disposed of without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~94
MADEENA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Goel, Adv. (through VC)
versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 19.01.2024
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
JANUARY 19, 2024 ‘KDK’
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:05:33
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should intervene regarding the petitioner's complaint, given the IO's undertaking to take appropriate action.
Madeena
State/NCT of Delhi
AMIT MAHAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
