Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution after petitioners failed to appear and did not comply with a direction to furnish their present addresses, indicating they were not interested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for the State along with Ms. Priya Rai, Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Mr. Jatin and Mr. Aashish Chojar, Advocates and with SI Rahul, P.S. Maidan Garhi. Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate for R-5 & 6.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
JANUARY 18, 2024/zp
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2024 at 15:19:26
Vaishali Sharma & Anr.
State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
