Dismissed
Ashok Kumar v. State & Anr.
Delhi HCCRL.M.C./1652/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This is a one-line order dismissing a petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear despite prior notices. It decides nothing of general application.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~17
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.M.C. 1652/2020 & CRL.M.A. 10972/2020 ASHOK KUMAR ..... Petitioner
¶4
Through: None. versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with SI Sonu Siwach, P.S. Sarai Rohilla. Mr. Amit Saxena, Mr. Vijay Yadav and Ms. Sushma Yadav, Advocates for R-2 along with R-2.
¶5
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
¶6
O R D E R
¶7
% 16.01.2024
¶8
- No one is present on behalf of petitioner today.
¶9
- On the last date of hearing also, no one had appeared on behalf of petitioner.
¶10
- It seems that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present matter any further.
¶11
- Accordingly, the present petition along with present application stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
ASHOK KUMAR
- respondent
STATE & ANR.
Coram
AI extract
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court