Justice Jyoti Singh disposed of WP(CRL) 161/2024 and CRL.M.A. 1424/2024. The petitioner's grievance regarding furlough was redressed by an order dated 10.01.2024. Consequently, the petitioner did not press the petition, leading to its disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~47
Through: Mr. Kunal Malhotra, Mr. Ravinder Gaur and Mr. Lalit Choudhary, Advocates
STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC with Mr. Alok Sharma and Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Advocates for State with SI Ajay Sharma, P.S. Kalyanpuri.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
CRL.M.A. 1424/2024 (exemption)
W.P.(CRL) 161/2024
relief:-
“a. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent to release the petitioner on furlough for a period of 03 weeks in case 486/2002, Under Section 365/396/34 IPC, Police Station Kalyan puri.”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/05/2024 at 12:31:11
dated 10.01.2024 will be shared by learned counsel for the Petitioner during the course of the day and will be communicated to the Petitioner as well.
JYOTI SINGH, J
JANUARY 16, 2024/kks
W.P.(CRL) 161/2024
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/05/2024 at 12:31:11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition seeking release on furlough should be allowed in light of the grievance having been redressed.
Jayant Amit
State (GNCT Of Delhi)
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
