The petitioner sought leave to withdraw a criminal writ petition. The Court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) THROUGH S.H.O. & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rupali Bhandhopadhya, ASC (Crl.) for the State with Mr. Sagar Mehlawat, Advocate with SI Kavish Rana PS Laxmi Nagar, Delhi.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R % 03.07.2024
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
JULY 3, 2024/ rd
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:14:21
MOHD. RIZWAN
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) THROUGH S.H.O. & ORS.
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
