Allowed

Mohan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC3 Jul 2024CRL.M.C./4969/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an order quashing an FIR registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute. The Court found that the parties had amicably settled and were living happily together. The FIR and consequent proceedings were quashed. The petition was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

The FIR No. 481/2022 and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom were quashed. The petition was disposed of.

Mohan Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~11

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CRL.M.C. 4969/2024 MOHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kartik Vashisht, Mr. Aditya Rathee and Ms. Riya Kalra, Advocates with petitioner in person.

¶4

versus

¶5

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with WASI Sunita and SI Partap Singh PS Mohan Garden, Delhi. Ms. Harshita Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R % 03.07.2024

¶8

The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No. 481/2022 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at P.S. Mohan Garden, Delhi on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.

¶9

The present FIR is an outcome of a matrimonial dispute between the complainant/respondent No. 2 (wife) and petitioner No. 1 (husband).

¶10

Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, learned APP for the State, submits that the petitioner is the only accused and respondent No. 2 is the complainant.

¶11

Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and that they have been happily living together for the past one and a half year.

¶12

The petitioner and respondent No. 2, who are both present in Court,

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 11:04:16

¶14

have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer/WASI Sunita and SI Partap Singh PS Mohan Garden, Delhi.

¶15

Respondent No. 2 states that she has been happily living with her husband i.e., petitioner No.1 and has no complaint against him. She further states that she has no objection if the present FIR and the consequent proceedings are quashed.

¶16

Learned counsels for the parties submit that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.

¶17

The parties shall remain bound by the statement made in Court today.

¶18

In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

¶19

With the above directions, the petition is disposed of.

¶20

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

¶21

JULY 3, 2024/ rd

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 11:04:16

Mohan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anand Saraf Vs State

Sourav Raghuvansi Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Prem Sudhakar Singh Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Ravi Alias Rohit Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Mohd. Rizwan Vs State (Nct of Delhi) through S.H.O. & Ors.

Rahul Singh Vs the State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.