Petitioner informed the court that he had preferred an SLP against the order under challenge, rendering this writ petition infructuous. The petition was accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
RAHUL ALIAS BATOLA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ishaan Mukherjee and Ms. Gunjan S Jain, Advocates
versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC for the State
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 04.07.2024
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
JULY 4, 2024/PT
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:30:07
Rahul alias Batola
The State Govt of NCT Delhi
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
