Petitioner sought a three-week extension of parole but counsel submitted he would instead file a fresh application for a second spell of parole under the Delhi Prison Rules and sought liberty to withdraw. The application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~70
RAMESH @ DUDHIYA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chetan Bhardwaj & Mr. Priyal Bhardwaj, Advs.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao (Standing Counsel (Crl.) for State with Mr. Abhinav Kr. Arya & Mr. Priyam Aggarwal. ASI Om Prakash, PS Sarai Rohilla.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R
% 17.09.2024
CRL.M.A. 28074/2024 ( seeking extension of parole for a period of three weeks )
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
SEPTEMBER 17, 2024 “SK”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:03:46
Ramesh @ Dudhiya
State NCT of Delhi
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
