Mohd Saqib v. Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner requested withdrawal of writ petition citing settlement. Court dismissed the petition along with the withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~58
MOHD SAQIB ..... Petitioner
Through Ms. Ishita Sharma, Adv. (VC).
versus
UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
..... Respondent
Through Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC for State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA O R D E R % 02.07.2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the matter has been settled, she may be permitted to withdraw the present petition.
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
JULY 2, 2024/AR..
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:11:12
MOHD SAQIB
UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court