Petitioners sought police protection against threats. The court noted the status report from the State committing to safety upon contact with officers and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Petition disposed of; State bound to provide safety upon contact with IO or beat officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~101
SANIYA @ SANJANA CHAUHAN AND ANR .....Petitioners
versus STATE AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V Khatri, ASC (Crl.) for State and SI Prashant Malik, PS Mayur Vihar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 15.07.2024
AMIT BANSAL, J
JULY 15, 2024/AR
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:13:23
Sania @ Sanjana Chauhan and Anr
State and Ors.
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
