The petition for police protection became infructuous as the petitioner had left Delhi. The court disposed of the petition, noting the petitioner's relocation and advising them to approach the Investigating Officer for security if threats persist in Delhi.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~100
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SHWETA SAMAL AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Anupradha Singh, Ms. Y. Asenla Pongen, Advs.
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V Khatri, ASC (Crl.) for State and SI Manish Tyagi, ASI Sushil Kumar, PS Govind Puri, SI Ashish Kumar, PS Okhla Industrial Area.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 15.07.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/07/2024 at 12:30:56
AMIT BANSAL, J
JULY 15, 2024/AR
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/07/2024 at 12:30:56
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should provide police protection to the petitioners?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SHWETA SAMAL AND ANR
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
