This order dismisses a writ petition as infructuous after it was submitted that charge sheets had already been filed in the underlying FIRs, rendering the protest petition moot.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~126
KAILASH CHAND .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ravi Rai, Adv.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V Khatri, APP for the state
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
% 12.07.2024
During the course of submissions, it has been submitted that the closure report was filed in FIR No. 130/2018 and FIR No. 370/2019 PS Tilak Nagar.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thereafter, a protest petition was filed wherein, the Court has taken cognizance.
Since the charge sheets have already been filed, the present petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above, the present petition along with pending applications stands dismissed as being infructuous.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
JULY 12, 2024 Pallavi
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:28:38
KAILASH CHAND
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
