Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the competent authority. The High Court granted liberty to file appropriate proceedings. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
Through: Mr.Rajive Manini, Adv. and Ms.Shriya Maini, AoR for petitioner with petitioner no.1 in person.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms.Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC with Mr.Abhijeet Kumar and Mr.Sagar Mehlawat, Advts. for State. SI Yashpal, PS S.Campus
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with the liberty to file an appropriate complaint/proceedings before a competent authority.
Liberty is granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
JULY 12, 2024/ rb/na
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/07/2024 at 11:47:08
MOHD LATIF KHAN & ANR.
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
