A writ petition was withdrawn at the petitioner's own request, and the High Court dismissed it as withdrawn with liberty to seek relief before the appropriate forum. No adjudication occurred.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~71
YASH TANDON .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vipul Goel, Advocate.
versus
STATE OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC, Crl. for State. Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Ms. Priya Shukla, Advocate for UoI. S.I. Sushil Kr., PS Kalkaji, Delhi.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
%
23.09.2024
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 S.Sharma
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:18:44
Yash Tandon
State of NCT Delhi
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
