Kusum Yadav v. the State, NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A criminal writ petition was abated after the State informed the court, on instructions, that the petitioner had died.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
versus
THE STATE, NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) for the State with Mr.Sangeet Sibou, Mr.Jatin, Mr.Mathew M.Philip, Ms.Priya Rai and Mr.Abhishek Tomar, Advts.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
O R D E R % 20.09.2024
Learned additional standing counsel for the State on instructions states that the petitioner in the present case is died.
In these circumstances, the proceedings in the present petition stand abated.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 rb/kr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:26:52
Kusum Yadav
The State, NCT of Delhi
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court