Petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition, stating it had become infructuous as he had been arrested in another case; withdrawal permitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
LAKSHAY VIJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tushar Rohmetra, Advocate.
versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 20.09.2024
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
SEPTEMBER 20, 2024 rk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:37:26
Lakshay Vij
Central Bureau of Investigation
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
