Writ petition sought transfer of investigation to SIT or CBI, compensation for alleged detention and assault, and quashing of prosecution. Since a chargesheet had been filed and trial was ongoing, the SIT/CBI prayer became infructuous; compensation could be pursued before the trial court. Petition dismissed with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
Through: Mr. Paul Kuamr Kali, Mr. Amarjeet Kumar Singh & Ms. Snighda, Advocates.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, SC, Crl. with Mr. Abhinav Kumar & Mr. Priyam Agrawal, Advocates for State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 23.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2024 at 12:06:17
at the time of conclusion of trial, before the learned Trial Court.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024 S.Sharma
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2024 at 12:06:17
2 issues framed by the court
Should investigation be transferred to SIT/CBI given the chargesheet already filed?
Is compensation for illegal detention/assault claimable in this writ petition?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shivani Kaul
Union of India & Ors.
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
