Amar Pal v. State (Nct of Delhi)
Case brief
What is this about?
Order listing matter before Registrar as petitioner failed to surrender after expiry of parole. Directs forwarding copy to Jail Superintendent.
What did the court decide?
Directed Registrar to initiate process for recovery as petitioner failed to surrender.
What the court decided
$~100
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 2894/2024 AMAR PAL .....Petitioner
- Through:
- versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr.Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate for State with SI Arvind Kumar, P.S. Sangam Vihar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
- O R D E R
- % 07.11.2024
Petition has been listed on Office Note, since petitioner has failed to surrender after expiry of period of parole granted vide order dated 24.09.2024 and extended vide order dated 15.10.2024.
Since the petitioner has failed to surrender on the expiry of period of parole, matter be placed before the concerned Registrar for initiating necessary process, in accordance with law.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Amar Pal
- respondent
State (NCT of Delhi)
Coram
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court