Writ petition seeking relief in a criminal matter became unnecessary after the State informed that the petitioner had been added in column 12 of the filed charge-sheet; counsel declined to pursue the petition and it was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~49
RAMAN KUMAR PARNAMI .....Petitioner
versus
STATE(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for State with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Ms. Chavi Lazarus and Mr. Arjun Singh Kadian, Advs. with Insp. Amit Pratap Singh, PS EOW.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R
ANISH DAYAL, J
JULY 11, 2024/MK
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:13:30
Raman Kumar Parnami
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
