Single-paragraph order clarifying that the Court did not adjudicate the plaintiff's civil suit rights despite recording the plaintiff's submission that the suit was dismissed, leaving him free to pursue other remedies.
Application disposed of; held that the Court did not adjudicate the civil suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~65
MRS NEERAJ VERMA AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. P.K. Bajaj, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Abhinav Kr. Arya and Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Advocates for the State with Inspector Pawan Kumar along with SI Rajveer, PS Neb Sarai.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 23.08.2024
CRL.M.A. 25310/2024 (for modification/clarification of Order dated 10.07.2024 )
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
AUGUST 23, 2024/RS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2024 at 11:59:06
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant modification or clarification to the order dated 10.07.2024 regarding the plaintiff's civil suit dismissal.
Mrs Neeraj Verma and Anr
The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
