Disposed

Mahesh Kumar Yadav v. Sh Keshav Chandra & Ors.

Delhi HC9 Dec 2024CONT.CAS(C)/1952/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition regarding implementation of a vending plan pursuant to Division Bench directions. Respondents reported active steps and a meeting held on 06.12.2024, with minutes placed on record. Petitioner did not press the petition but sought liberty to file afresh if no further action is taken; the court disposed of it with liberty granted.

What the court decided

AI extract

Mahesh Kumar Yadav Vs Sh Keshav Chandra & Ors. — Delhi HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~122

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 1952/2024 & CM APPL. 72064/2024

¶4

MAHESH KUMAR YADAV .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Ms. Bibhuti Bhushan Mishra with Mr.Anubhav Gupta, Ms. Srishti Saundary and Mr. Shivalika, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

SH KESHAV CHANDRA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mohd. Irsad, ASC, GNCTD with Ms.Nasreen and Mr. Kunal Raj, Advocates

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

¶10

O R D E R % 09.12.2024

¶11

Learned counsel for respondents appears on advance notice and states that the active steps are already underway and a meeting had also taken place on 06.12.2024. He has also placed on record the minutes of such meeting. The same is taken on record. Copy thereof has also been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶12

It is submitted that the vending plan is a very exhaustive exercise but despite that in terms of the specific directions given by learned Division Bench of this Court on 12.09.2024, every effort is being made to complete the process as expeditiously as possible.

¶13

After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not press the present petition at the

¶14

¶15

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2024 at 11:52:09

¶18

moment but if no further action is taken by the respondent within further reasonable time, he may be permitted to file the petition afresh.

¶19

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as not pressed. Liberty, as prayed, is granted.

¶20

MANOJ JAIN, J

¶21

DECEMBER 9, 2024 st

¶22

¶23

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2024 at 11:52:09

Mahesh Kumar Yadav v. Sh Keshav Chandra & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Mahesh Kumar Yadav v. Sh Keshav Chandra & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ritu Sethi Vs Leela Singh

Gurcharan Singh Vs Manisha

Manveer Vs Ajay Kumar Bhalla and Anr.

Ravi Kumar Vs Ajay Kumar Bhalia and Anr.

Mr. Shiv Kumar Vs Mr. Yash Chaudhary District Magistrate/Collector (North

Smt Indu Raheja Vs Shri Anil Kumar & Anr.

Poonam Sehrawat Vs Anoop Sehrawat & Anr.

Mohd Shawab Minor through Natural Guardian Mohd Bilal Vs Dr. Priti Saxena & Anr.

Ritu Sethi Vs Leela Singh

Rekha Garg Vs Delhi Development Authority

Gurcharan Singh Vs Manisha

Tej Singh Vs Swarshi Sabharwal

Hemant Kumar Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Prabhjot Singh Dhillon Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.