Ritu Sethi v. Leela Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
Indi an court disposed of two complaint-contempt petitions filed against each other as the underlying grievance regarding property vacated and complaint withdrawn by one party ceased to exist.
What did the court decide?
Petitions disposed of as grievance no longer exists; next date cancelled.
What the court decided
$~112 & 113
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 509/2024 RITU SETHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jai Wadhwa, Advocate versus LEELA SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Achal Gupta, Ms. Alizaah Raiz and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advocates + CONT.CAS(C) 1125/2024 LEELA SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Achal Gupta, Ms. Alizaah Raiz and Mr. Ujjwal Jain, Advocates versus RITU SETHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jai Wadhwa, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 06.12.2024
- At the very outset, learned counsel for the parties submit that nothing further survives in the present contempt petitions. It is informed that Ms. Leela Singh has already withdrawn her complaint which was pending consideration before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun, Uttarakhand and the property in question has also been vacated by Ms. Ritu Sethi and the keys have been handed over to Mr. Sonu, authorized representative of Ms. Leela Singh.
CONT.CAS(C) 509/2024 & CONT.CAS(C) 1125/2024 1
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/12/2024 at 12:53:52
- In view of the above, learned counsel for respective petitioners submit that these petitions may be disposed of as grievance does not exist any longer.
- Petitions stand disposed of accordingly.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ritu Sethi
- respondent
Leela Singh
Coram
Manoj Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court