Dismissed

Prabhjot Singh Dhillon v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC9 Dec 2024CONT.CAS(C)/1942/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an interim order in a contempt petition concerning non-compliance with a Coordinate Bench order regarding Grievance Redressal. The respondent undertook to supply collated information within six weeks, causing the petitioner to disprress the petition contingent upon breach.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to revive the petition if the respondent fails to supply information within six weeks; liberty granted.

Prabhjot Singh Dhillon Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors. — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~114

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 1942/2024 & CM APPL. 71942/2024

¶4

PRABHJOT SINGH DHILLON .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Mr. Krishnagopal Abhay, Mr. Karmanya Singh Sareen, Mr. Sahib Singh Dhillon & Ms. Pari Bhardwaj, Advs. with petitioner in person. versus

¶5

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

¶6

.....Respondent Through: Shri Yeeshu Jain (Through VC) , Learned standing Counsel with Mr. Hitanshu Mishra, Advs.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 09.12.2024

¶11

Petitioner seeks initiation of contempt against the respondents as they have not complied with the directions contained in the Order dated 02.05.2024 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.6034 of 2024.

¶12

The attention of this Court has been drawn towards the order dated 06.11.2023 passed by learned Central Information Commission (CIC) and also the directions contained in paragraph no.10 and 12 of the above said order passed by the learned Coordinate Bench of this Court.

¶13

Shri Yeeshu Jain, learned standing counsel appears on advance notice

¶14

¶15

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2024 at 11:51:46

¶17

through VC and submits that the process is underway and the entire information, after necessary collation, shall be supplied to the petitioner within six weeks from today. He submits that the statement is on the basis of the instructions he has received from the respondents. Such statement is taken on record.

¶18

In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the time sought by the respondent is beyond the time given by the learned CIC but, in view of the above said statement, the petitioner, at the moment, does not press his contempt petition. He, however, submits that in case, despite the expiry period of six weeks from today, the directions are not complied with, the petitioner may be permitted to revive the present petition. 5. The contempt petition is, accordingly, disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Liberty, as prayed, is granted.

¶19

MANOJ JAIN, J

¶20

DECEMBER 9, 2024 PK

¶21

¶22

¶23

Prabhjot Singh Dhillon v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhjot Singh Dhillon v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ritu Sethi Vs Leela Singh

Gurcharan Singh Vs Manisha

Manveer Vs Ajay Kumar Bhalla and Anr.

Ravi Kumar Vs Ajay Kumar Bhalia and Anr.

Mr. Shiv Kumar Vs Mr. Yash Chaudhary District Magistrate/Collector (North

Smt Indu Raheja Vs Shri Anil Kumar & Anr.

Poonam Sehrawat Vs Anoop Sehrawat & Anr.

Mohd Shawab Minor through Natural Guardian Mohd Bilal Vs Dr. Priti Saxena & Anr.

Ritu Sethi Vs Leela Singh

Rekha Garg Vs Delhi Development Authority

Gurcharan Singh Vs Manisha

Tej Singh Vs Swarshi Sabharwal

Hemant Kumar Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Mahesh Kumar Yadav Vs Sh Keshav Chandra & Ors.