Disposed

Smt Indu Raheja v. Shri Anil Kumar & Anr.

Delhi HC10 Dec 2024CONT.CAS(C)/1954/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition disposed of as not pressed after respondents assured that a report was being prepared for a Registrar decision pursuant to prior Division Bench directions; petitioner granted liberty to revive if directions not complied with.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as not pressed; liberty to revive contempt petition if time undertaking lapses without action.

Smt Indu Raheja Vs Shri Anil Kumar & Anr. — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~113

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1954/2024 & CM APPL. 72281/2024 SMT INDU RAHEJA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Garg, Mr. Imran Khan and Ms. Jahanvi Garg, Advocates versus

¶3

SHRI ANIL KUMAR & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Puhumi Aditya, and Mr. Jawahwar Raja, ASC-GNCTD Mr. Satish Panchal, Advocate for Intervener (Through VC)

¶4

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

¶5

O R D E R

¶6

% 10.12.2024

¶7

CM APPL. 72281/2024 (exemption)

¶8

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶9

¶10

Learned counsel appears for the respondents appears on advance notice and submits that concerned Assistant Registrar is in the process of preparing a report which would be tabled before the Registrar within one week from today and, thereafter, the Registrar shall take appropriate decision keeping in mind the specific directions contained in order dated 31.07.2024 passed by learned Division Bench of this Court in W.P. (C) No. 10494/2024.

¶11

In view of the aforesaid statement and assurance, Mr. Shiv Charan Garg, learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner, at the moment, is not interested in pursuing her present petition. He, however, submits that in

¶12

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2024 at 11:51:48

¶14

case nothing is done despite expiry of the time as undertaken above, petitioner may be permitted to revive the present contempt petition.

¶15

In view of the above, present petition is disposed of as not pressed. Liberty, as prayed, is granted.

¶16

MANOJ JAIN, J

¶17

DECEMBER 10, 2024/ dr

¶18

¶19

Smt Indu Raheja v. Shri Anil Kumar & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Indu Raheja v. Shri Anil Kumar & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Andhra Pradesh Basketball Association & Ors. Vs Chander Mukhi Sharma & Anr.

Ishtiyak Hussain Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Om Prakash & Ors. Vs Rajiv Chaudhary General Manager , North Railway & Ors.

Abhimanyu Garg Vs Gaurang Shetty & Ors.

Neeraj Kumar Vs Shri Ajay Kumar Bhalla and Ors.

Neeti Vs Sh Arihant Khicha

Sarpal Singh Vs Amardeep Singh Bhatia & Ors.

Manavjit Singh Sandhu & Ors. Vs M/S Pratap University & Ors.

Andhra Pradesh Basketball Association & Ors. Vs Chander Mukhi Sharma & Anr.

Ishtiyak Hussain Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Om Prakash & Ors. Vs Rajiv Chaudhary General Manager , North Railway & Ors.

Mr. Shiv Kumar Vs Mr. Yash Chaudhary District Magistrate/Collector (North

Ira Joshi Vs Life Insurance Corporation of India and Ors.

Ravi Kumar Vs Special Task Force,Dda and Ors.