Disposed
Gurcharan Singh v. Manisha
Delhi HCCONT.CAS(C)/910/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Contempt petition against a magisterial court order; the underlying order had been set aside in revision by the Sessions Court, rendering the contempt proceedings infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~61
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CONT.CAS(C) 910/2024
¶4
GURCHARAN SINGH .....Petitioner
¶5
Through: Mr. Nimish Chib with Mr. Divye Chugh, Advocates.
¶6
- versus
¶7
MANISHA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Harshita Sharma, Advocate.
¶8
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
¶9
O R D E R
¶10
% 06.12.2024
¶11
- At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that order dated 09.02.2024 passed by the concerned Magisterial Court has already been set aside by the learned Court of Sessions in a Revision Petition filed by the respondent herein and, therefore, the present contempt petition does not survive anymore.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Gurcharan Singh
- respondent
Manisha
Coram
AI extract
Manoj Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court