The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition (CONT.CAS(C) 194/2020) where the non-appearance of the petitioner and a compliance affidavit filed by the respondent indicated that the impugned order had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
.....Petitioner
versus
RAJIV CHAUDHARY GENERAL MANAGER , NORTH RAILWAY & ORS
.....Respondent Through: Ms.Pratima N. Lakra, CGSC with Mr.Chandan Prajapati, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R
% 09.12.2024
CONT.CAS(C) 194/2020 1
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2024 at 11:52:20
MANOJ JAIN, J
DECEMBER 9, 2024/ sw
CONT.CAS(C) 194/2020 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/12/2024 at 11:52:20
Om Prakash & Ors
Rajiv Chaudhary General Manager, North Railway & Ors
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
