Writ petition seeking rectification of a Registrar of Companies entry regarding a Citibank loan repaid in 2012. Court permitted a fresh application under the Companies Act, 2013 and directed the RoC to decide it within three weeks, noting the delay was unintentional.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~78
Through: Mr. Prakhar Mittal and Ms. Vaishali Shukla, Advocates.
versus
REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr. Adil Hussain Taqvi, GP and Mr. Yasharth, Ms. Astu, Ms. Taha, Ms. Usha, Mr. Ali Khan and Mr. Ayushman, Advocates for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R % 13.05.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2024 at 11:56:43
this Court by filing the instant writ petition.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
MAY 13, 2024 S. Zakir
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2024 at 11:56:43
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Registrar of Companies can be directed to rectify an erroneous charge entry for a loan that has been repaid.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Satish Kumar Sethi
Registrar of Companies, Delhi
Anr.
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
