The petition was disposed of as having become infructuous based on the petitioner's counsel's statement recorded on record. No substantive legal principle is established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar and Mr. Shagun Ruhil, Advocates.
versus
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF RESETTLEMENT AND ORS.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Digvijay Rai and Mr. Archit Mishra, Advocates for Airports Authority of India. Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Sarvan Kumar, Advocate for UoI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R % 10.05.2024
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
MAY 10, 2024 S.Zakir
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/05/2024 at 20:03:32
M/s Essgar Groups
Directorate General of Resettlement
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
