Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition after refund was sanctioned but interest computation date was disputed. Court dismissed petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
versus
COMMISSIONER OF VAT AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Prateek Badhwar, Ms. Shaguftha H. Badhwar and Ms. Samridhi Vats, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA O R D E R
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
MAY 10, 2024/ vp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 18:44:05
Swastik Traders
Commissioner of VAT
and others
Sanjeev Sachdeva
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
