Petitioner's counsel stated the grievance no longer survived, leading the Delhi High Court to dispose of the writ petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
MADHU TIWARI ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rahul Malik, Advocate.
versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
It is stated by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the grievance of the Petitioner no longer survives.
Statement of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner is taken on record. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
MAY 13, 2024 Rahul
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/05/2024 at 11:56:31
MADHU TIWARI
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
SUBRAMANIUM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
