This is a one-line order where the petitioners were granted liberty to withdraw their writ petition, and it was consequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Liberty to withdraw the present petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
RIDGEVIEW CONSTRUCTION (P) LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Nakul Ahuja and Mr. Akshay Pratap Singh, Advocates
Versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, SC Mr. Salil Kapoor, Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani and Mr. Vibhu Jain, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 09.05.2024
Learned counsel for the writ petitioner prays for liberty to withdraw the present petition.
Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
MAY 09, 2024 p’ma
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 11:29:27
Ridgeview Construction (P) Ltd.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation
Yashwant Varma
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
