Petitioner failed to appear despite second call due to a typo in the text. This order dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~51
VINOD KUMAR PANDEY ..... Petitioner
Through: None
versus
M/S GENERAL INDUSTRIAL COMPANY ..... Respondent
Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
O R D E R % 08.05.2024
As per office report, notice to the respondent could not be issued as PF was not filed.
No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner even on second call. It seems that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this matter any further. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
MAY 8, 2024 dy/db
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 11:27:40
VINOD KUMAR PANDEY
M/S GENERAL INDUSTRIAL COMPANY
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
J
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
