Discussed in light of a judgment in a related Income Tax Appellate Tribunal matter. The High Court held there was no further justification to entertain the challenge to the Tribunal's order dismissing a miscellaneous application and dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
versus
ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-7 ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sunil Agarwal, Sr.SC with Mr.Shivansh B.Pandya, Jr.SC and Mr.Utkarsh Tiwari, Adv for I.T.Dept.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
In light of the judgment rendered today in ITA 1479/2018, there exists no further justification to consider the challenge raised in the instant writ petition. This since the writ petition had merely raised a challenge to the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissing a miscellaneous application.
It shall stand dismissed.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
MAY 09, 2024/MJ
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 11:33:19
M/s. SSA International Ltd.
Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-7
Yashwant Varma
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
