Writ petition regarding an unauthorised window. Counsel stated the private respondent closed/removed the objectionable window as directed by MCD, and the grievance stands mitigated; the court disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57
Through: Mr.Prashant Pakhiddey and Mr.Manav Gill, Advs.
THE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI MCD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Mukesh Gupta and Mr.Shashi Gupta, Advs for MCD.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMARKAURAV O R D E R % 09.08.2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
AUGUST 9, 2024/MJ
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/08/2024 at 12:09:18
Pukhraj Singh Chug
The Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Delhi MCD
Others
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
