A workman sought modification of an earlier order releasing court-deposit interest to his employer, calling it harsh, seven months after it was passed. The court found no reason to modify and dismissed the application as misconceived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
RANJEET MISHRA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abdul Wahid Mshaal, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R D E R % 02.05.2025
CM APPL. 26543/2025 [Modification of order dated 23.09.2024]
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:54:12
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
MAY 2, 2025/ ha
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:54:12
1 issue framed by the court
Should the order dated 23.09.2024 directing release of interest to the petitioner be modified?
M/S Thomas & Co Pvt Ltd
Ranjeet Mishra
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
