The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition (W.P.(C) 23835/2005) and pending application due to non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on multiple occasions without seeking an adjournment. The order was passed per the principle of non-prosecution.
Petition and pending application dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-115
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Petitioner
Through: None
versus
BHARAT CHANDRA JENA ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Shreya Kukreti, Mr.Nikhil, Ms.Divya Aggarwal and Mr.Tanmaya Dhari Sinha, Proxy counsel for Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
O R D E R % 01.05.2024
No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to take a passover or an adjournment.
On the last occasions also i.e. 16th January, 2024 and 12th March, 2024, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this matter any further. Accordingly, the petition alongwith pending application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
MAY 1, 2024 dy
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2024 at 14:49:53
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
BHARAT CHANDRA JENA
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
