The petitioner did not appear in person or by counsel. Having failed to appear on previous occasions, the court dismissed the petition and pending application for non-prosecution.
Petition and pending application dismissed for non-prosecution due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-117
Through: None
versus
RAMESHWAR PRASAD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Shreya Kukreti, Mr.Nikhil, Ms.Divya Aggarwal and Mr.Tanmaya Dhari Sinha, Proxy counsel for Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
O R D E R % 01.05.2024
No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner either to take a passover or an adjournment.
On the last occasions also i.e. 16th January, 2024 and 12th March, 2024, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this matter any further. Accordingly, the petition alongwith pending application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
MAY 1, 2024 dy
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2024 at 14:45:41
GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI
RAMESHWAR PRASAD & ORS.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
