Petitioners sought leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue other remedies. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with the requested liberty. No substantive issue was decided.
Liberty granted to seek appropriate remedies available under law; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Raghvendra Upadhyay, Panel Counsel along with Ms. Purnima Jain and Mr. Vaibhav Tripathi, Advs. for R-1.
Mr. Vikas Chopra, SC along with Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advs. for R-2/MCD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
O R D E R % 03.05.2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedies, as may be available under law.
Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
SACHIN DATTA, J
MAY 3, 2024/at
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2024 at 11:40:57
Rahul Kumar & Ors.
The Govt of NCT of Delhi
MCD (Respondent 2)
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
